earned in a normal classroom setting. Teaching sports and physical education is certainly important. It is interesting to note that this idea has come full circle. Just weeks ago there was a big controversy in New York because many schools, including elementary and middle schools, were putting Body Mass Index on report cards. Many people in today's society are obsessed with healthy eating and physical wellbeing. The number of people that work out has increased noticeably in the past few decades. So the idea of focusing on physical fitness is not a new or foreign idea; people have been concerned with health and fitness since way back when.On the other hand, I believe that people should be well rounded. Many student athletes get criticized for
1 comment:
Yes, I read about the "body mass index" report case too. What's the difference between a physical education program like the one described at Rugby and sending kids home with a BMI report? It's interesting that Olds, for example, made no reference to the advantages of a physical education program on physical health, or weight. Is a focus on weight/BMI an "objectification" of the body (ie reducing it to its external appearance or set of numbers) instead of the body being part of our "subjectivity" (ie part of our viewpoint and action on the world)?
(Nb. I should say that Rugby did also have a regular academics program, its just that its sports program received a lot of attention, both inside the school and by other schools)
Post a Comment